The Logical Reasoning section gives you a short block of facts and four possible conclusions, and asks which one actually follows. The trap is that the most realistic answer is usually not the supported one. Take the free timed drill, get scored instantly, and see which specific reasoning error is costing you marks.
Every item is built the same way: a short block of given facts, then a question asking which conclusion follows from them, then four answer options. Options of the "none of the above" or "none of these conclusions follows" kind appear in this format and are frequently correct.1 Here is one worked end to end, free, with no sign-up.
Item counts, section timing and scoring rules for the Logical Reasoning Test are set by CBP and can change between hiring cycles. CBP publishes the current structure on its own hiring pages; confirm yours before you test.2 The format above is what the section asks you to do, and that does not move.
Distractors on a logical reasoning item are not random. Each one is a specific, named mistake, written deliberately to catch a specific habit. Learn the six and the wrong answers start announcing themselves. The free drill scores you against exactly these six.
Two things move together in the facts, and the option turns that into one causing the other. Co-occurrence is data. Causation is an addition you made.
Example: busy weeks also had more secondary inspections → "high volume causes more inspections."The facts give you if A then B. The option quietly reads it as if B then A. Formally this is affirming the consequent, and it is the single most common wrong answer in the format.
Example: everyone who finished the module got a certificate → "she has a certificate, so she finished the module."The facts say some or most. The option says all, or none. One quantifier word changes and the conclusion stops being supported.
Example: some Tuesday-shift agents hold the certification → "all Tuesday-shift agents are on standby."The option is true of the world, and not stated in the facts. This is the one that costs experienced candidates the most, because the more you know about fleets, rosters and logs, the more confidently you fill the gaps.
Example: a vehicle went out of service for a week → "it was being repaired." Probably. Not given.A requirement is necessary: without it you are out. The option treats it as sufficient: with it you are in. Meeting one condition is not meeting all of them.
Example: you must pass the qualification to be eligible → "he passed it, so he is eligible."Nothing in the facts records X, and the option concludes X did not happen. An empty log is a fact about the log. It is not a fact about the week.
Example: the incident log has no entries for that week → "there were no incidents that week."Neither is a lack of intelligence. Both are the habits that make you effective everywhere else in life, which is exactly why they are hard to switch off in a testing room.
Outside a test, filling gaps from experience is competence. A vehicle out of service for a week was probably being repaired. Six missing flashlights were probably lost. On this section, every one of those inferences is an unsupported addition, and the item was written to reward the option that adds nothing. The more operational experience you bring, the more this costs you, because your gap-filling is fast, confident and invisible to you.
Candidates systematically pick a conclusion because a conclusion feels like what a test wants. So an item whose correct answer is "the facts do not establish this" gets skipped in favour of the most probable-sounding option. Restraint scores here. Two or three items in this drill are built on that pattern for exactly that reason, and it is the highest-yield thing you can practise in an evening.
Both habits are trainable in hours rather than weeks, because there are only six error shapes to recognise. That is unusual for an exam section and it is why this one is worth targeting first.
Read this table as a map, not as a specification. We publish no item counts, no time limits, no weightings and no passing scores for this exam, because we hold no verified source for them. CBP publishes the current structure on its own hiring pages, and it can change between hiring cycles. Confirm yours before you test.
| Component | What it asks | Item count & timing | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logical Reasoning Test (LRT) | A block of given facts, then which conclusion follows from them. Four options, typically including a "none of these" style choice.1 | Not stated here. Confirm on CBP's hiring pages.2 | Format described |
| Other written components | The entrance exam is described as having more than one section. The number of sections, their names and the order in which they are administered are not stated here.3 | Not stated here. Confirm on CBP's hiring pages.3 | Unverified |
| Language component | Whether the exam includes a Spanish-language assessment, an artificial-language component, who is required to sit which, and whether either can be deferred, is not stated here.4 | Not stated here. Confirm on CBP's hiring pages.4 | Unverified |
| Experience / background questionnaire | Whether the process includes a self-reported experience or background questionnaire, how it is scored, and what role it plays in the overall result, is not stated here.5 | Not stated here. Confirm on CBP's hiring pages.5 | Unverified |
| Scoring & weighting | How raw answers convert to a reported score, whether wrong answers are penalised, how the LRT is weighted against other components, and what the qualifying threshold is, are all set by CBP.6 | Not stated here. Confirm on CBP's hiring pages.6 | Unverified |
| Retesting | Whether and when a candidate may retake the entrance exam, and any waiting period, are set by CBP and can change between cycles.7 | Not stated here. Confirm on CBP's hiring pages.7 | Unverified |
Why this table is mostly blank on purpose. Plenty of prep sites will quote you a precise item count and a precise passing score for this exam. We could copy those numbers in ten minutes. We are not going to, because we cannot show you where they came from, and a number you cannot source is worse than no number at all when your career is downstream of it. What we do stand behind is the item format and the reasoning training, and both of those are demonstrated free on this page before you spend anything.
Logical reasoning is learnable in a way that most exam content is not. There are six error shapes, one discipline, and a format that repeats. That is what the system drills.
Practice questions written in the given-facts format, graded from clean two-premise items up to the multi-premise items where the tempting conclusion is the realistic one. Volume in the right format, not volume for its own sake.
Every question type broken down in detail: what the item is testing, how the distractors are constructed, and the one question to ask yourself before you commit to an option. Once you can name the error, you can see it.
Instant reports and feedback after every drill, keyed to the six error types. You find out which fallacy you personally fall for, which is a far more useful number than a score.
Proven exam strategies for the format: read the question stem before the facts, test each option against the text rather than against your judgment, and treat "nothing further follows" as a live candidate on every item.
Up-to-date, expert-designed material maintained by our psychometric team. Where the exam administration is not publicly documented, we say so on the page rather than invent a specification.
Late prep? No problem. The compressed route runs the diagnostic, the six error types and one timed set, ordered by your weakest error rather than by module number. Built for candidates testing inside the week.
Find the error you personally fall for, drill that one first, then prove it under a clock.
Free, 5 or 12 minutes. You get a raw score, a percentage, and a breakdown across all six error types, so you know whether you are reversing conditionals, over-generalising, or filling gaps from experience.
Question types explained in detail, then targeted sets on your weakest error first rather than module one. Most candidates need one focused evening to move a single error type from reflex to recognition.
The failure mode under time pressure is reverting to the realistic answer. A timed set with an instant report tells you whether the discipline survives the clock, which is the only version that counts.
Specific about what changed, not just that something did. Every review links to the verified original.
Solid review course that covers the relevant topics in good detail.
Great Program, amazing practice sims. Easy to understand. Passed tests on first time thru.
Highly recommended. Great instructional information. I passed on the first try.
These are real, verbatim reviews from our public Trustpilot profile, across PrepTerminal courses. No Border Patrol-specific review exists on the profile yet, and we would rather show you three real ones from other courses than write a fourth.
Two different numbers, stated separately on purpose. 4.5 from 1038 course reviews is the CBP QuickPass™ course rating, from 6,876 CBP students. 4.3 from 443 reviews is our profile-wide Trustpilot score across every course. Both retrieved 2026-08-21 from one central source (templates/cbp-course-trustpilot.php), never typed into this page.
Twelve original items in the given-facts format, two for each of the six reasoning errors. Instant score, a breakdown showing which error you fall for, and a full worked explanation of every item, including the ones you got right.
Free, no account, choose 5 or 12 minutes. Or see pricing
Format practice, error-type diagnostics, explained question types and timed sets, with the exam-administration facts left honestly open rather than invented.
Given facts, four options, one supported conclusion. Graded from clean two-premise items to multi-premise items where the realistic answer and the supported answer come apart.
Each item type broken down: what is being tested, how each distractor was built, and the check that catches it. Naming the error is what makes it visible under time pressure.
Scored the moment you finish, with a breakdown by reasoning error rather than a single number. You find out which fallacy is yours.
Stem before facts. Test options against the text, not against judgment. Keep "nothing further follows" live on every item. Simple rules, drilled until they are reflexes.
Written and maintained by PrepTerminal's psychometric team. Where CBP has not published a detail, the course says so and points you to CBP's own hiring pages.
Full refund within seven days of purchase. One payment, no subscription, no renewal. Michael reads every refund email personally.
One price, one payment. No tiers to weigh up and no subscription to cancel.
Testing this week? The compressed path is one focused evening. Start tonight.
Logical reasoning items are not intelligence tests, they are discipline tests. Candidates lose marks because they answer from what they know rather than from what they were given, and because a conclusion feels safer than admitting nothing follows. Both are fixable in hours once you can name the six errors. I write the items and the explanations myself, and I answer questions about the format, the error types and the refund at [email protected]. If a claim on this page is out of date, tell me and I will correct it and re-date the sources block.
Where we cannot verify something, the answer says so and points you to CBP. If something is not covered here, email [email protected].
It is a section of the Border Patrol Agent entrance exam that measures deductive reasoning. Each item gives you a short block of facts and asks which of four conclusions follows from those facts alone. The option set typically includes a "none of these" style choice, and that choice is often the correct one.1 Nothing in the section requires outside knowledge of law, policy or operations, and importing that knowledge is the fastest way to lose marks.
We do not publish an item count or a time limit for this section, because we hold no verified source for either. CBP publishes the current structure on its own hiring pages, and it can change between hiring cycles: confirm yours before you test.2 Any prep site quoting you a precise figure should be able to show you where it came from. What we can tell you with confidence is the item format, and you can see it worked end to end on this page for free.
Set by CBP, not by us, and not stated here.6 Qualifying thresholds, how raw answers convert to a reported score, and whether wrong answers carry a penalty are all administration details published by the agency. Confirm the current rule on CBP's own hiring pages. Practically, the useful target is not a threshold, it is consistency: on a well-written logical reasoning item, the supported answer is not a matter of degree, so a trained candidate converts nearly all of them.
No, and you should be sceptical of anyone who says theirs are. Live items are not published, and reproducing them would be a copyright and integrity problem for you as much as for us. Every item here is original, written by our psychometric team in the same given-facts format, with distractors built on the same six named reasoning errors. That is what transfers: the format and the discipline, not memorised content.
Retest eligibility and any waiting period are set by CBP and can change between hiring cycles.7 We do not state a rule here because we hold no verified source for the current one. Check your applicant portal or CBP's hiring pages, and if you are told something different by a recruiter, take the recruiter's version.
Take the free drill first so you find out which of the six errors is yours, then drill that one before anything else. Most candidates are dominated by one or two, usually reversing conditionals or importing outside knowledge. After that, do timed sets, because the failure mode under a clock is reverting to the realistic answer. The whole route is an evening's work for a motivated candidate, which is why this section is the most efficient place to spend your prep time.
We do not state here whether the entrance exam includes a Spanish-language assessment or an artificial-language component, who is required to sit which, or whether either can be deferred, because we hold no verified source.4 CBP publishes the current requirements on its own hiring pages. Confirm yours before you test. This course covers logical reasoning; if a language component applies to you, plan for it separately.
Whether the process includes a self-reported experience or background questionnaire, how it is scored, and what weight it carries are set by CBP and not stated here.5 Confirm on CBP's hiring pages. Where such questionnaires exist in federal hiring generally, the standing advice is to answer accurately and be able to substantiate what you claim.
No. PrepTerminal is independent preparation material. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or any government agency. We do not administer the exam, we have no access to live items, we cannot influence your result, and we are not a route into the hiring process. Buying prep from us is buying practice, nothing else.
7-day money-back guarantee: one email to [email protected], no forms and no support tickets. The published pass rate across PrepTerminal courses is 92%, never 100%, because no honest prep can promise that.